Grace Church Roanoke, Virginia
Dr. Jack L. Arnold Lesson #41
ACTS
Ideal Evangelism
Acts 17: 1-15
If you had a choice of becoming like
any evangelist who has ever lived, who would you like to be? Would it be Augustine, Martin Luther,
John Calvin, George Whitefield, John Wesley, Charles Spurgeon, D. L. Moody or
Billy Graham? These were or are
all famous men but the most brilliant and talented evangelist of all time was
the Apostle Paul. If you must
pattern yourself after some evangelist, let it be Paul, for he was the ideal
evangelist.
If you were the ideal evangelist and
you had a choice as to the ideal audience to which you would like to preach,
what audience would that be? Would
it be the audience Polycarp preached before in the Roman Coliseum just before
he was burned at the stake? Would
it be Luther preaching before the Diet of Worms, indicating that he would not
recant? Would the audience be the
Indians to whom David Brainard preached as he coughed up blood on the white
snow? Perhaps the ideal audience
would be the thousands of people George Whitefield preached to in the Boston
Common during the Great Awakening?
Would the congregation of the Metropolitan Tabernacle, over which Spurgeon
was pastor, be the ideal congregation?
Would the ideal congregation or audience be the filled-to-capacity Los
Angeles coliseum where Billy Graham preached? These would all be exciting audiences but perhaps the most
ideal audience to ever receive the gospel was the Bereans. In Berea, the Apostle Paul had an ideal
situation in which to preach the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ.
IDEAL EVANGELIST - Acts 17:1-9
His Method (17:1, 2)
ÒNow when they had traveled through
Amphipolis and Apollonia, . . .Ó
-- Paul and his band of
missionaries, consisting of Silas, Luke and Timothy, left Philippi during the
second missionary journey, moving over the famous Roman road called the
Egnatian Way which crossed Macedonia and connected the Adriatic Sea with the
Black Sea. Amphipolis and
Apollonia were cities along the Egnatian Way. The Egnatian Way would be comparable to our modern day
freeway system from coast to coast.
It was the main road to carry the great Roman armies and commerce. The Romans built this road for
military, political and commercial purposes, but God, in His providence, had
them build this road to carry his gospel heralds swiftly allover the Roman
Empire. The distance from Philippi
to Amphipolis was 33 miles; Amphipolis to Apollonia was 30 miles, and Apollonia
to Thessalonica was 37 miles. It
was about a three day journey from Philippi to Thessalonica, and they stayed
overnight in each city.
ÒThey came to Thessalonica, where there
was a synagogue of the Jews.Ó
-- The missionaries had
specifically chosen Thessalonica as the city to do concentrated
evangelism. The original name of
Thessalonica was Therma, but in 315 B.C. the Macedonian king, Cassander (a
trusted general of Alexander the Great before his death), enlarged the city and
strengthened it, and then named it after his wife Thessalonica, who was the
daughter of Philip II and step-sister of Alexander the Great. Thessalonica was the capital of the
province of Macedonia with a population estimated at 200,000. It was an important commercial city and
it had a free government not under Roman control.
Paul passed by Amphipolis and Apollonia
which were important cities.
Why? Paul had a definite
strategy in his evangelism. He
evangelized key cities which had a Jewish synagogue. The Greek literally says, ÒWhere there was the
synagogue of the Jews.Ó
Apparently, Amphipolis and Apollonia had no Jewish synagogues. Paul always stuck with his game plan in
evangelism; it was never a hit or miss situation. Apparently, Paul and his missionaries were not running
frantically through the streets of Amphipolis and Apollonia trying to lead men
to Christ since they only had a few hours in these cities. The text seems to imply that they did
no evangelism in either city.
Apparently, the Holy Spirit had directed them not to evangelize these
cities. Why? Because it was the plan of God that the
Thessalonians who were won to Christ by Paul would witness to those in
Amphipolis and Apollonia.
ÒFor the word of the Lord has sounded
forth from you, not only in Macedonia and Achaia, but also in every place your
faith toward God has gone forth, so that we have no need to say anythingÓ (I
Thess.l:8).
ÒAnd according to Paul's custom, he
went to them, and for three Sabbaths reasoned with them from the Scriptures.Ó -- Paul's missionary strategy was to minister to Jews in the
synagogue first where there would also be Jewish proselytes and God-fearing
Gentile seekers (called proselytes at the gate) who had not yet embraced
Judaism. Paul knew the scriptural
command concerning the Jew. ÒFor I
am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to
everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the GreekÓ (Rom.
1:16). Paul also had a great
burden to see his Jewish kinsmen won to Christ.
ÒBrethren, my heart's desire and my
prayer to God for them is for their salvationÓ (Rom. 10:1).
ÒFor I could wish that I myself were
accursed, separated from Christ for the sake of my brethren, my kinsmen
according to the fleshÓ (Rom. 9:3).
Paul spent three Sabbaths preaching to
the Jews. This has caused some
scholars to believe that Paul was in Thessalonica only three weeks and then
left. He may have been in the city
more than three weeks, but he was limited to three weeks ministry within the
synagogue itself. Most scholars,
however, feel that Paul was not in Thessalonica for more than six weeks. This is significant since the Epistles
of First and Second Thessalonians were the first inspired letters written by
Paul around A.D. 51 or 52. In
these letters, we see how Paul taught these young believers doctrine and he
assumed they understood what he was saying. He wrote them about election, the death of Christ, the call
to salvation, the convicting work of the Holy Spirit, the wrath of God, the
kingdom, judgment on unbelievers, apostasy, the man of sin, the second coming
of Christ and the resurrection of believers. The church at Thessalonica was a well-taught local church
and grounded in sound doctrine.
Some might say, ÒWhat did Paul do the
rest of the week when he wasnÕt preaching on Saturday in the synagogue?Ó He
made tents to earn a living.
ÒFor you yourselves know how you ought
to follow our example; because we did not act in an undisciplined manner among
you, nor did we eat anyone's bread without paying for it, but with labor and
hardship we kept working night and day so that we might not be a burden to any
of you; not because we do not have the right to this, but in order to offer
ourselves as a model for you, that you might follow our exampleÓ (II Thess.
3:7-9)
He was also building up the Christians.
ÒBut we proved to be gentle among you,
as a nursing mother tenderly cares for her own children. Having thus a fond affection for you,
we were well pleased to impart to you not only the gospel but also our own
lives, because you had become very dear to us. For you recall, brethren our labor and hardship, how working
night and day so as not to be a burden to any of you, we proclaimed to you the
gospel of God. You are witnesses,
and so is God, how devoutly and uprightly and blamelessly we behaved toward you
believers; just as you know how we were exhorting and encouraging and imploring
each one of you as a father would his own children, so that you may walk in a
manner worthy of the God who calls you into His own kingdom and gloryÓ (I
Thess. 2:7-12).
Paul was an industrious servant of
Christ. In a few short weeks he
evangelized much of the city, established a local church and carried on an
effective follow-up program. Paul
worked hard at his ministry and so should every other man who claims to be a
true minister of Jesus Christ. The
ministry is not a job or a profession.
It is a calling and way of life.
When Paul went into the synagogue he Òreasoned
with them from the Scriptures.Ó
Paul used the Old Testament Scriptures as the basis for all his
reasoning with the Jews. Every
address he made in the synagogue was from the Word of God. Paul did not depend upon human
reasoning or sentimental emotionalism to win his hearers but on the Bible
alone. Paul did not throw out the
intellect but he reasoned from the Scriptures, showing the logic and
consistency of the Christian position over against Judaism and the pagan Greek
and Roman philosophies and the mystery cults of that day. Paul appealed to the heart and the
conscience through the mind. He
knew people had to have right information before they could make an intelligent
commitment to Christ.
His Message (17:3)
ÒExplaining . . .Ó -- The first thing Paul did was to explain (ÒopenÓ - KJV) the
Old Testament passages on the Messiah.
Paul unfolded or expounded to these unbelieving Jews the truth
concerning a suffering and resurrected Messiah from the Old Testament. He gave a verse by verse explanation of
the key texts on the Messiah. Paul
took no other books but the Bible, for he believed in the inspired Bible and so
did the Jews, and they would recognize no other authority.
Today we need more preachers who will
expound the Scriptures verse by verse to people so they can understand the
meaning of the text and get a grounding for some kind of biblical and
systematic theology. There is not
one pulpit in a hundred in America which seeks to teach books of the Bible in a
verse by verse method.
About five years ago I was called by the
Irving Bible Church in Irving, Texas (just outside of Dallas, near Texas
Stadium) to candidate for that pulpit.
They would have paid me over $4,000.00 more than I was being paid at
Grace Church, and there were over 500 people in that congregation. It was very tempting. I prayed about it. God definitely spoke to me the fact
that He had called me to Grace Church and my work was not finished here. He also spoke to me about the fact that
at that time there was no church in the Valley with an expository, verse by
verse ministry of the Word, and Dallas had all kinds of these preachers and
teachers. I phoned them back and
said, ÒNo, thank you.Ó They
thought I was a little crazy but I had peace.
Ò. . . And giving evidence . . . Ò -- In the Greek this literally means Òplacing beforeÓ or Òto
sit down by the side of.Ó What
Paul did was expound the Old Testament texts and then showed from the life,
death and resurrection of Jesus Christ that He was the fulfiller of all these
predicted prophecies concerning the Messiah.
Paul undoubtedly turned to Psalm 22,
written one thousand years before Christ, which so accurately portrays His
death by crucifixion.
ÒMy God, my God, why hast Thou forsaken
me? . . . Be not far from me, for trouble is near; For there is none to
help. Many bulls have surrounded
me; Strong bulls of Bashan have encircled me. They open wide their mouth at me, As a ravening and a roaring
lion. I am poured out like water,
And all my bones are out of joint; My heart is like wax; It is melted within
me. My strength is dried up like a
potsherd, And my tongue cleaves to my jaws; And Thou dost lay me in the dust of
death. For dogs have surrounded
me; A band of evildoers has encompassed me; They pierced my hands and my
feet. I can count all my
bones. They look, they stare at
me; They divide my garments among them, And for my clothing they cast lotsÓ
(Psa. 22:1, 11-18).
The amazing thing about this prophecy
is that death by crucifixion was not known in King David's day. It was a Roman innovation and yet it
was accurately described a thousand years before Christ. Paul probably turned to Isaiah 53,
written 750 years before Christ, to show that the Messiah was to suffer in
order to die for the sins of His people.
ÒSurely our griefs He Himself bore, And
our sorrows He carried; Yet we ourselves esteemed Him stricken, Smitten of God,
and afflicted. But He was pierced
through for our transgressions, He was crushed for our iniquities; The
chastening for our well-being fell upon Him, And by His scourging we are
healed. All of us like sheep have
gone astray, Each of us has turned to his own way; But the LORD has caused the
iniquity of us all to fall on Him" (Isa. 53:4-6).
Paul surely quoted Psalm 16 to show
that the Messiah would be resurrected from the dead. ÒFor Thou wilt not abandon my soul to Sheol; Neither wilt
Thou allow Thy Holy One to see the pitÓ (Psa. 16:10).
Ò. . . That the Christ had to suffer
and rise again from the dead, . . .Ó
-- These Jews had made up a
preconceived theology concerning the Messiah. They saw Him as a mighty King, a triumphant victor over all
religious and political foes, namely the Roman Empire. Yet the Jews had no place for a
suffering Messiah. The verses in
the Old Testament which spoke of Messiah reigning were exalted and the verses
which spoke of His suffering were ignored or explained away. A suffering, crucified Messiah was a
great offense to the Jews because they refused to be honest with the Scriptures
about Messiah. Therefore, they had
a theology which would not let them come to the truth.
Many Christians today have enslaved
themselves to dynamic, persuasive men and/or dogmatic theological systems which
will not let them come to the truth.
They are slaves to men and systems and are no better off than these
blinded Jews.
Ò. . . And saying, ÔThis Jesus whom I
am proclaiming to you is the Christ.ÕÓ
-- These Jews would listen
intently as long as the apostles spoke of a man who suffered and was raised
from the dead. The coup de grace
came when Paul said that this Christ was Messiah, for they had no place in
their theology for a suffering Messiah.
Furthermore, if He was the Messiah, they had put Him to death, and it
would take real humility to admit they were wrong.
Today, in so-called Christian circles,
if a preacher speaks on general subjects such as ÒJesus, the Teacher,Ó or ÒJesus,
the One Who Suffered at the Cross as an Example,Ó or even, ÒJesus, the One
Whose Disciples Claimed He Was Raised from the Dead,Ó there is not too much
static. Yet, preach ÒChrist Died
for Sinners Who Are Headed for Eternal Judgment, and Men Will Go to Hell
Without this Christ,Ó then there is immediate objection. Still further, preach on ÒGod's
Electing Love and Christ's Death for His People Only, and the Holy Spirit's
Right to Draw Whom He Pleases,Ó and even many Christians get up in arms.
Paul was the ideal evangelist because
he used the Bible as his only authority and instructed people in the truths of
Christianity before asking for a commitment to Christ.
His Many Converts (17:4)
ÒAnd some of them were persuaded and
joined Paul and Silas, . . .Ó
-- Some of these hardened,
legalistic, prejudiced Jews saw the light and were persuaded that Jesus was the
Messiah. They became convinced in
the mind and made a commitment to Jesus Christ as Lord and Messiah to follow
Him at all costs. This was not
some superficial, emotional decision.
They understood that Christ was offering the forgiveness of sin, eternal
life and heaven, and that to follow Him would mean rejection by most of their
Jewish colleagues. It says, ÒsomeÓ
were persuaded, not all. The
majority of Jews stayed in their unbelief, for religious people are the hardest
to reach for Christ. This is also
true even today. The minority
believe in Christ, the majority will not.
Ò. . . Along with a great multitude of
the God-fearing Greeks . . .Ó
-- These were Jewish
proselytes, or proselytes at the gate, who had grown weary of the pagan Roman
and Greek philosophies and religious mystery cults. These folks were polytheists and were attracted to the
monotheism of Judaism and the standard of morality in Judaism.
When the gospel was preached to them,
they were greatly impressed and they believed in Christ. Neither Greek philosophy or rigid Judaism
had done anything for their souls and these searching Greeks were set free and
liberated when they came to know Jesus Christ.
Ò. . . And a number of leading women.Ó -- The gospel had a real appeal to women, especially women of
the upper classes who were prominent citizens in the Greek cities. There is a reason for this magnetic
appeal Christ had to women. These
were educated women who knew the Greek philosophies and had been in the
religious cults. They knew that
these man-made philosophies were empty, vain and dead, offering nothing for the
inward spirit. These philosophies
and mystery cults were totally humanistic, full of voluptuous and degrading
sexual practices which left these women devastated and filled with
self-loathing. They were disgusted
with free sex and they turned to Jesus Christ for forgiveness, who, in turn,
gave them a sense of self-worth and value as human beings.
Paul was the ideal evangelist because
he knew how to reach people where they were and to bring them to the Living
Christ for new life.
His Maligning Enemies (17: 5-9)
ÒBut the Jews, becoming jealous and
taking along some wicked men from the market place, formed a mob and set the
city in an uproar; and coming upon the house of Jason, they were seeking to
bring them out to the people.Ó
-- The Jews were jealous of
the success Paul was having among the attenders at the synagogue. They were crying, ÒSheep stealers!Ó Jealousy over anotherÕs education,
wealth, personality or social standing is bad, but the most ugly jealousy of
all is in the area of religion.
These angry Jews went to the marketplace where the loafers, hoods and
social misfits and outcasts hung out.
The Jews probably paid them to incite a riot in the city against Paul and
his missionary band.
The devil never gives up. When he is defeated by Scripture and
logic, he turns to violence to stamp out Christianity. These young radicals knew how to
manipulate a crowd to irrational actions.
The crowd, at a fever pitch and emotional high, went to the home of
Jason where Paul was staying.
ÒAnd when they did not find them, . . .Ó -- Paul and the missionaries were gone. God providentially protected them from
the lynch mob. Perhaps they had
received word of this mob action and went into hiding or perhaps God just had
them step out for a moment to miss the action.
Ò. . . They began dragging Jason and
some brethren before the city authorities, shouting, ÔThese men who have upset
the world have come here also; . . . ÕÓ
-- They falsely accused
Paul and the missionaries of lawlessness, disorder and disturbing the
peace. They claimed that wherever
these men went they Òupset the world.Ó
It is true that Paul and the missionaries often had trouble in a city
because they preached Christ, but they were not lawless. The gospel always causes some to get
upset and we must expect it if we are to be true to Jesus Christ. ÒThese things I have spoken to you,
that in Me you may have peace. In
the world you have tribulation, but take courage; I have overcome the worldÓ
(Jn. 16:33).
In a book entitled, The Cost of
Commitment, Dr. John White, a psychiatrist and minister in Canada, said,
It would be foolish of us to assume
that our present luxurious freedom will continue indefinitely. (Freedom is the delayed end result of
the Reformation, with its biblical view of man. As the biblical influence wanes, it is likely that freedom
will not continue.) There are
signs that the conditions necessary for tolerance and freedom are already being
eroded. Democracy is a fragile
flower of late bloom (it was in its present form completely unknown to the
Greeks) liable to be withered by scorching winds of impatient hate. It is therefore important that we all
ask ourselves: Am I willing to
risk imprisonment and death for Christ?
Many professing believers are not willing . . . If you are faithful in little things
while freedom lasts, chances are that you will be faithful when the big tests
come. There is valuable training
in faithfulness where you are now.
If you are open and honest--true to yourself and true to Christ--your
life will provoke hostility in some and will powerfully attract others. To some it will be a "savour of
life unto lifeÓ and to others Òof death unto death.Ó If you are faithful to Him it may make you unpopular and
unprosperous . . . I do not wish
to be an alarmist about what it costs to be faithful to Christ yet I feel I
must point both to Scripture and to the course of church history. I want to awaken the Western Church with
the blast of a trumpet, warning her that the normal conditions under which the
Church bears witness are not those we now experience, but are conditions
inimical to Christian witness. I
believe that the darkness may be descending again, and I fear that few of us
are prepared for it. We belong to
a long tradition of martyrdom, but we have become soft and ill-prepared.
ÒÕAnd Jason has welcomed them, and they
all act contrary to the decrees of Caesar, saying that there is another king,
Jesus.Õ And they stirred up the
crowd and the city authorities who heard these things.Ó -- The Jews then accused Paul of rebellion, sedition and
treason. They claimed that Paul
was preaching another king than Caesar, and he was. Paul preached Christ, the King of Kings, but His kingdom was
a spiritual kingdom, not a political kingdom.
ÒJesus answered, ÔMy kingdom is not of
this world. If My kingdom were of
this world, then My servants would be fighting, that I might not be delivered
up to the Jews; but as it is, My kingdom is not of this realmÕÓ (Jn. 18:36).
Paul taught submission to human
government. This, however, does
tell us that Paul preached Jesus Christ as King, Lord, Master and Ruler, and we
should do the same today.
ÒAnd when they had received a pledge
from Jason, and the others, they released them.Ó -- Jason either
gave his word or gave his money to the authorities with a guarantee that Paul
and his band would leave Thessalonica.
Paul was the ideal evangelist because
he would not compromise the truth of Jesus Christ and was willing to suffer for
his convictions. He understood
that the gospel causes a spiritual revolution in all who truly are saved. Children often come up with deep truth
without realizing it. A little
girl said to her mother, ÒThe Bible begins with Genesis and ends with
Revolutions.Ó Out of the mouth of
babes comes truth.
IDEAL AUDIENCE - Acts 17:10-15
Their Exemplary Reputation (17:10, 11a)
ÒAnd the brethren immediately sent Paul
and Silas away by night to Berea; and when they arrived, they went into the
synagogue of the Jews. Now these
were more noble-minded than those in Thessalonica, . . .Ó -- Paul and his cohorts escaped to Berea, but not before the
gospel had been preached and a foundation laid for a local church in Thessalonica.
Berea was a city about 50 miles
southwest of Thessalonica. It was
an out-of- the-way city not on the Egnatian Way. This was a beautiful city in the mountains and had many
gorgeous gardens, due to the abundance of water in this area. Above all, Berea was a city where the
aristocracy lived. It was like a
retirement center for wealthy military, political and educational leaders. When Paul arrived in Berea, he went
immediately into the synagogue, keeping with his game plan. It says of the attenders of the
synagogue in Berea that they were Òmore noble-mindedÓ than the synagogue
attenders in Thessalonica. The
Greek literally says Òmore noble.Ó
This means that the Bereans were of a more noble class than those in
Thessalonica; that is, this refers to social nobility. However, it also means that they were
more noble in quality of mind and heart.
They were more generous, liberal and gracious in their feelings and more
ready to inquire candidly into the truth of the doctrine Paul and Silas were advancing. The Bereans were highly educated people
and they were open- minded to what Paul had to say. The synagogue attenders in Thessalonica were uncritical in
their thinking, prejudiced to the truth, more emotional and impulsive towards
the gospel. The Bereans were much
more willing to deal objectively with the facts of the gospel as they were
proclaimed by Paul.
Their Enthusiastic Response (17: 11 b)
ÒFor they received the word with great
eagerness, . . . Ò -- This ideal audience listened with rapt
attention to what the evangelist Paul had to say concerning Christ and they
gave him a respectful hearing.
They were eager to receive what Paul had to say because they had an
educated mind which generally is more ready to look at all sides of a question.
The Thessalonians also received the
word.
ÒKnowing, brethren beloved by God, His
choice of you, for our gospel did not come to you in word only, but also in
power and in the Holy Spirit and with full conviction; just as you know what
kind of men we proved to be among you for your sake. You also became imitators of us and of the Lord, having
received the word in much tribulation with the joy of the Holy SpiritÓ (I
Thess. 1 :4-6).
Can one person or group be more noble
in the act of receiving the Word and Christ? No, for all must come to faith in Christ by an act of the
will. However, one can be more
objective about the truth than another person, and this was the case with the
Bereans. They had a super attitude
in that they checked everything out with the Scriptures before they made any
commitments.
The ideal audience has a receptive mind
and heart to the truth and wants to examine it objectively.
Their Eager Research (17: 11c)
ÒExamining the Scriptures daily, to see
whether these things were so.Ó
-- The Bereans who attended
the synagogue examined everything Paul was saying in light of the Old Testament
Scriptures. They did not conclude
everything false which did not accord with their preconceived opinions nor
would they accept any new teaching without carefully checking it out with
Scripture. These folks were not
pew sitters; they were Bible students.
They were cautious and careful about what they believed and they used
only the Scriptures as their final authority. If it was in the Book, they would accept it. Both the Thessalonians and the Bereans
received the Word of God, but the Bereans were more skeptical and analytical
while the Thessalonians were more gullible. These Bereans challenged what the preacher was saying, not
to get in a theological argument but to come to the truth. Notice the Bereans did this daily. They were not only earnest but they
were diligent in their pursuit of truth.
They not only read the Bible devotionally but they studied the Bible
theologically. The Bereans were
the ideal audience, and would be to God we would have more like them today.
The Bible is our only guide, as
Christians, to tell us what is true and what is false, what is right and what
is wrong, what is of God and of Satan.
Unless a Christian grounds his faith in the Holy Scriptures, he will be
lost in a sea of relativism, where everybody does that which is right in his
own eyes, setting each individual up as his own authority. Unless a Christian makes the Bible his
only authority for faith and living, he will be misled and manipulated so as to
believe that he is his own god.
This, of course, is the basis for all humanism today.
We face a great danger in America today
among evangelicals. Most
evangelicals are gullible, emotional and man-centered. They rarely search the Scriptures. They have believed in Christ but they
do not search the Bible for convictions for living and theology. They gather around some teacher and
say, ÒI am of Paul, or Peter or Apollos.Ó
They do not test things they believe and do by the Bible, and their
theme song is, ÒWhere he leads us we will follow; what he feeds us we will
swallow.Ó Just because some Bible
teacher or evangelist says something, that does not make it right. If a man says, ÒI have the truth,Ó or ÒI
know the Greek,Ó that does not make him an authority. We must study the Bible for ourselves and check all teaching
of men with the Bible. We must be
willing to change when we are convinced from the Scripture alone. The Reformation brought back to Christians
our right as self-sustaining believer-priests to read and interpret the Bible
without a priest or a church telling us what Scripture means. It is our God-given right and privilege
to study the Scripture daily.
Remember, too, that as long as we are
in this body of flesh, we shall never understand the Bible perfectly. There is always room for improvement
and refinement in one's understanding and proclaiming of the Word of God.
Dwight Hillis said:
Be our theories of inspiration what
they may, this book deals with the deepest things in manÕs heart and life. Ruskin and Carlyle tell us that they
owe more to it, in the way of refinement and culture, than to all the other
books, plus all the influence of colleges and universities . . . Read all other
books, philosophy, poetry, history, fiction; but if you would refine the
judgment, fertilize the reason, wing the imagination, attain unto the finest
womanhood or the sturdiest manhood, read this book, reverently and prayerfully,
until its truths have dissolved like iron into the blood. . . . The book Daniel Webster placed
under his pillow when dying is the book all should carry in the hand while
living.
Their Easy Reception (17:12)
ÒMany of them therefore believed, along
with a number of prominent Greek women and men.Ó -- These folks,
upon a diligent study of Scripture, became persuaded of the truth and committed
to Christ as their personal Lord and Savior. If men will carefully examine Scripture, they will come to
the truth of salvation in Christ Jesus.
All the Bereans started out as skeptics but they ended up as true
believers and followers of Christ.
Once they were intellectually convinced, the bowing of their wills to
Christ was a rather easy step.
One of the problems in modern day
evangelism is an appeal to the emotions without proper understanding with the
mind. Consequently the mind is
passed over, and while some kind of a commitment has been made, it was not
based on a persuaded mind. This,
of course, sets up a terrible conflict between the mind unconvinced and the
heart not fully committed to truth.
This has left many so-called Christian converts in total derision.
Many infidels have confessed that they
had never carefully read the Bible.
Thomas Payne, who wrote The Age of Reason, a book that shook
Puritan New England for humanism, confessed that he wrote the first part of his
book without having a Bible at hand, and without its being possible to procure
one where he then was in Paris. He
said, ÒI had neither Bible nor Testament to refer to, though I was writing
against both; nor could I procure any.Ó
Their Endless Refuters (17:13-15)
ÒBut when the Jews of Thessalonica
found out that the Word of God had been proclaimed by Paul in Berea also, they
came there likewise, agitating and stirring up the crowds. And then immediately the brethren sent
Paul out to go as far as the sea; and Silas and Timothy remained there. Now those who conducted Paul brought
him as far as Athens; and receiving a command for Silas and Timothy to come to
him as soon as possible, they departed.Ó
-- The Jewish legalists
hounded Paul wherever he went because they hated his doctrine of Messiah and
free grace in salvation and sanctification. These hounds of hell came to Berea, 50 miles from
Thessalonica, to stir trouble for Paul.
These Jews despised Paul and were after him because he was the
leader. Silas and Timothy stayed
in Berea. Paul left Berea but not
before the foundation for a local church was established.
We hear nothing of Berea after this
event in the New Testament. Paul
may have written a letter to them but it has not been preserved. Why? Perhaps this was such a spiritually healthy church there was
no need to write them a letter. We
do know this that in Berea today, after 2000 years of corruption, the church
Paul planted has now become the persecutor of true Bible-believing
Christians. The Greek Orthodox
Church, dead in apostasy, is forcing evangelical Christians to almost an underground
status.
CONCLUSION
This text of Scripture tells us many
Greeks were persuaded that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God. These Greeks found no salvation in
Athena, Zeus, Plato or Aristotle.
They found no salvation in the sensuous mystery cults. They were weary of humanism of all
types and they turned to Christ for salvation, and they were gloriously
liberated. My unsaved friends,
there is no salvation in science, philosophy or psychology. There is no salvation in the new
morality, free sex, libertinism, existentialism, women's lib or genetic
engineering. Salvation is only in
Jesus Christ, and only Christ can fill the vacuum in your soul. ÒAnd there is salvation in no one else;
for there is no other name under heaven that has been given among men, by which
we must be savedÓ (Acts 4:12).
This text also tells us that some Jews
turned to Christ. The religious
man is always the toughest nut to crack because he thinks he is so good. Yet Christ invaded the lives of some of
these Jews and set them free from man-made religion. Christ gave them spiritual liberty to be slaves to the
Living Christ.
Are you a believer? Are you persuaded that Christ is the
only Savior and that He died for your sins? If you are not, trust Christ, bow to Him as King, submit
your mind to Him as Lord. There is
no greater intellectual or emotional pursuit than to know Jesus Christ as Lord,
Savior and King!