CHRISTÕS INTERPRETATION OF
DIVORCE
(Matt. 5:31, 32; 19: 3-12)
I.
INTRODUCTION
A.
Divorce is on the
increase in America. At the present
time one out of three marriages ends in divorce. In some upper middle class sections in the larger cities
like New York and San Francisco, the ratio is one out of every two marriages
ends in divorce.
B.
Divorce is the
break up of the family unit and the family unit is the foundation of any
society. A nation that makes
divorce easy is on its way to ethical decadence.
NOTE: History shows us that in the last few
decades before the fall of both the Grecian and Roman empires, marriage was
held in such low esteem that it was a common thing for the women to keep tab on
their divorces by the number of rings worn on their fingers.
C.
The world has its
own standard of morality, which by Biblical standards is very low. We should remember that these teachings
on divorce are for true Christians, who believe in the authority of GodÕs Word
for their lives.
NOTE: It is because Christians have accepted
a high viewpoint of divorce and remarriage that Christian homes are more
solid. An interesting statistic is
that only about one out of every 1000 Christian marriages ends in divorce.
II.
BACKGROUND (Matt. 5:31, c.f. Deut. 24:1-4)\
A.
Much of Matthew 5
is a contrast between the external, hypocritical righteousness of the religions
Jews and the internal, true righteousness He requires of real believers. The Jews had built up hundreds of
man-made traditions around the law of the Old Testament. These traditions were taking precedence
over the genuine spiritual interpretation of the law.
B.
It hath been
said, ÒWhosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing
of divorcement.Ó These Jews went
back to Deut. 24:1-4 to support a very flexible and loose viewpoint of
divorce. Because their traditions
they had added to the meaning of the Law.
These Jews implied that the law commanded a husband to divorced his wife (which it never does), and he could put
his wife away for just about any cause he pleased, as long as he gave her a
bill of divorcement.
1.
Spiritual
Interpretation Of Deut. 24:1-4:
Divorce
was permitted for uncleanness (unseemly thing), which probably refers to
adultery. In those days there was
much divorce for about any cause, and God sent forth this law to protect women
from ill treatment by their husbands, for they were being divorced for
frivolous reasons. God allowed
divorce to improve a chaotic condition.
God, through Moses, was not approving of divorce, but merely allowing
its continuance-- even as He allowed polygamy-- for a time. A woman would also have to have a bill
of divorcement, for she had legal status only through her father or
husband. Without this bill of
divorcement, she was likely to end up as a harlot.
NOTE: God gave this law to Israel to make it
hard to get a divorce, for marriage is not something that people can walk in
and out of at will.
2.
False
Interpretation Of The Pharisees:
During
our LordÕs ministry on earth, there were two interpretations among the
Pharisees on the meaning of ÒuncleannessÓ. The School of Shammai, which was very strict, held that
ÒuncleannessÓ meant sexual immorality or adultery; thus the only basis for
divorce was adultery. Their
interpretation was correct but they in the minority. The School of Hillel, which was very lax, held that
ÒuncleannessÓ applied to almost anything that would warrant divorce. If a wife spoiled the supper, chatted
with another man, spoke disrespectfully of her husband or any such little
thing, she could be divorced. They
did not take marriage seriously at all, and it was very popular with people,
especially the husbands. NOTE: Of course the ultimate motive behind
all this freedom was nothing but lust and passion, for these Jews wanted a
respectable way to sin.
III. WHAT JESUS CHRIST TAUGHT ABOUT DIVORCE (Matt. 5:32 cf. 19: 3-12)
A.
Background: Matt.
5:32 gives the LordÕs teaching on divorce but it is more clearly taught in
Matt. 19:3-12. A group of
Pharisees make an attempt to test Christ and ask him, (ÒIs it lawful for a man
to put away his wife for every cause?Ó)
(v. 3). These Jews think
they have trapped Christ, for if he agrees with them that a woman can be put
away for any cause, He contradicts MosesÕ teaching in Deut. 24. If He agrees with Moses teaching that
any kind of _____ ?_______ _____?_______ is the only cause,
then His teaching is no higher than MosesÕ, which lessens his authority.
NOTE: Jesus,
the master teacher goes back to the original design for marriage to show that
the concept of no divorce has
been the ideal in GodÕs mind for marriage (v. 4-6). God never intended that marriage should
end in divorce for any reason.
B.
Why Moses
Allowed For Divorce (19:7, 8):
Christ
teaches that divorce was allowed or permitted in the Old Testament because of
the hardness of the IsraelitesÕ hearts.
The word ÒhardnessÓ means stubborn or calloused, showing that the
children of condition of the nation and the low moral condition of the
people. It was a stop-gap measure to elevate the institution of marriage and
rescue it from chaotic conditions.
NOTE: The key
to understanding this section is found in the words, (ÒBut from the beginning
it was not so.Ó) Divorce was not
part of the original design for marriage as seen in Adam and Eve. GodÕs ideal is no divorce, because man
and wife are one flesh and are in an indissoluble union. Remember, Christ is talking to real
Christians who believe that Christ is the authority for their lives. The Christian standard for marriage is
much higher than that of the unsaved world.
C.
What Is The
Meaning Of ÒFornicationÓ? (19:9a.)
1.
Fornication Is
Adultery: The most common
interpretation is that there is one condition to break a marriage and that is
adultery, for those who accept this view equate ÒfornicationÓ with
Òadultery.Ó Fornication does at
times refer to sexual immorality in the broadest sense (Eph. 5:3; I Thess. 4:3;
Rev. 2:20, 22) and may refer to adultery. There are, however, some obvious
objections to this viewpoint:
a.
The Greek word
for ÒfornicationÓ is porneia.
The Greek has a word
for adultery which is moicheia. Why didnÕt the Lord use moicheia?
b.
In Matthew 15:19
(also Gal. 5:19), a distinction is made between fornication and adultery.
c.
In I Cor. 7,
where the Apostle Paul is discussing divorce, no mention is made of adultery as
being a cause for divorce. Surely
Paul knew our LordÕs teaching.
d.
If Christ is
making adultery a cause for divorce, then His standards for marriage are no
higher than that of Jews, whether of the School of Shammai or the School of
Hillel.
e.
ÒFornicationÓ is
not mentioned in the parallel accounts in the Gospel of Luke (Lk. 16:18) and
the Gospel of Mark (Mark 10:2-12).
Perhaps ÒfornicationÓ refers to some Jewish custom, for the Gospel of
Matthew was written to the Jews.
2.
Jewish Engagement Customs: Engaged couples were spoken of by the
Jews as husband and wife.
(Matt. 1:18-20). This
engagement period was as binding as marriage but there were not the sex
privileges that go along with marriage.
When Christ says Òexcept
for fornicationÓ He is speaking of release from the bonds of betrothal, not of
marriage. If a woman was found
unfaithful during this period, she could be put away.
3.
Marriage Of
Relatives: Leviticus 18:1-18
forbids physical relations
and marriage with close relatives.
For instance one could not marry his fatherÕs wife (stepmother). This was sometimes called a
Òfornications marriageÓ (I Cor. 5: 1).
If this were the case, then the marriage could be resolved.
D. What Are The Consequences Of Divorce? (19:9a)
If
a man puts away his wife for any other reason than fornication (either
unfaithfulness to an engaged partner before marriage or marrying a close
relative), then he is guilty of committing adultery if he marries another. Also, if the woman,
put away for an unjust cause, is married by another that one is
committing adultery with her.
E. The Reaction Of The Disciples (19:10-13):
Here is the second key to understanding this section
for his disciples clearly understood that the Lord was teachi9ng a very high
standard for marriage, which was no divorce, not even for adultery. The disciples concluded it was better
not to marry if there was no way to get out of it.
POINT: Jesus Christ has a high standard for
marriage.
IV. EXHORTATION TO CHRISTIANS:
Christ had a high view on marriage. He has been talking to Christians and
His words are authoritative for them.
Whatever else may be implied in Matthew 19, it is clear that Christ is
teaching that
there is no divorce for those who call themselves Christians and followers of
Jesus Christ. Christian young
people, be wise, go slow and pray much about your lifeÕs partner, for when you
choose him or her, it is for life and there is no condition for backing
out. If you make the wrong
decision, then you have to live with that decision the rest of your life. Divorce for two Christians in marriage
brings the discipline of God. The
standard is higher for GodÕs children than the world.
V.
EXHORTATION
TO THE NON-CHRISTIAN:
Someone
might say, ÒWhat about the person who has been married and divorced before he
or she became a Christian?Ó All
the unsaved are tangled in sin because of the world system. The sin of divorce is no worse than any
other sin, although it may leave more permanent scars than other sins. It is my firm conviction the Bible
teaches that the person who is divorced before salvation
cannot be penalized by other believers (Isa. 43:25). He or she may remarry but only in the
Lord. Even adultery is not the
unforgivable sin. It is a terrible
sin, but God forbid that
there should be anyone who feels that he or she has sinned himself or herself
outside the love of God or His Kingdom because of adultery or divorce. If you will trust Christ as your
Saviour and Lord, He will forgive you and
give you a new life. But remember
the words of our Lord, who said to the sinful woman, who trusted in Him, ÒGo
and sin no more.Ó NOTE: If God can forgive the sins of divorce
and adultery, surely he can forgive any sin. If you have sin that plagues you night and day, Jesus Christ
can pardon you, and He will pardon you if you will turn to Him to bestow His
mercy, love and grace on you.